Menu

Members

    Stat

    Total Torrents: 104,231
    Total Downloads: 109,458,125
    Total Comments: 67,617
    Members: 187,088
    Pop Free Users: 33
    Online Users: 9,598
    30 Day Hits: 6,700,212

    Friend Sites

    Genres

    P2P Groups

    Sponsored Links

    New user comments

    Page 1234567891011 > >>
    M 8V 9A 9
    [55 minutes ago]
    davidamanda , 36, F, Australia - see her 722 comments
    one of the better series around at the moment along with the black list and homeland thanx to all,,(:-(
    M 4V 9A 9
    [past hour]
    davidamanda , 36, F, Australia - see her 722 comments
    A little weak, more like a made for TV poor acting only a 4 from us ,,thanx to all,,(:-(
    M 8V 10A 1
    [past hour]
    CharlyFilm , 51, M, Spain - see his 14 comments
    Terrible audio, seem it was recording in a dark movie hall with a crap toy microphone drowned in water to 200 feet away of speakers.
    M 2V 9A 9
    [2 hours ago]
    TheFilter , 118, M, Australia - see his 20 comments
    Hmm.. AWESOME MOVIE!! - if you have an IQ below 70. Their "snow" is actually sand passed off by recolourising the vid. Their "pilot" flies the plane from the wrong seat. Doubt they were even in Canada at all, although I read a review that indicated it was filmed there. Do they have sand dunes in Canada? Seems they were determined to keep it low budget with free actors. Video quality good but movie is a bucket of puke. At least it reminded me what NOT to watch.
    M 2V 9A 9
    [6 hours ago]
    traxi , 31, M, Belgium - his first comment
    A disaster. I can't think of a 2 worse movies :s
    M 3V 5A 5
    [10 hours ago]
    Cerian , 38, M, United States - see his 312 comments
    A silly, clearly cheap, - cgi and models, - Aussie-made, zombie-horror over-dramatization, but not entirely worthless, else Mirren would not be in it.
    M 10V 10A 10
    [15 hours ago]
    fusspot , 73, M, United Kingdom - see his 982 comments
    The high rating for A/V is because they are exceptional for a movie filmed over 80 years ago and are very good. The movie is a great classic that sticks close to Stoker's original book, though shortening some parts of it. The acting is that which was common in those days and a bit theatrical and over-melodramatic and it has to be seen to belonging to an age when the "talkies" had only just begun. How many of us know why they were called the "talkies", which came after the "flicks"? Interesting to see how they overcame their lack of special effects and lack of film-making techniques. Quite ingenious, in my view. Wonderful viewing and a must for all film buffs! Bela Lugosi always looked so malevolent and threatening in such films with his glacial mesmerising stare and it had become a common role for him! Great fun!
    M 9V 10A 10
    [15 hours ago]
    JustTay , 24, M, Philippines - his first comment
    PLs..Update your episodes here..T_T
    M 8V 10A 10
    [21 hours ago]
    fusspot , 73, M, United Kingdom - see his 982 comments
    Excellent movie with excellent acting. Worth seeing.
    M 2V 9A 9
    [21 hours ago]
    fusspot , 73, M, United Kingdom - see his 982 comments
    A typical clichéd TV movie with Dynasty or Dallas-style acting. Silly and highly contrived plot which just collapses at the end. Waste of time.
    M 1V 8A 8
    [yesterday]
    frunkkis , 32, M, United States - see his 14 comments
    Another pretentious "coming of age" Hollywood movie to attack Christianity. How original. Let's set it during Reagan's presidency too because he was such a conservative totalitarian freak.
    M 3V 9A 9
    [yesterday]
    davidamanda , 36, F, Australia - see her 722 comments
    Just a copy off the first one, nothing new ,just B- class at its best ..something to watch if really needed,,thanx to all,good video and audio,,(:-(
    M 3V 8A 6
    [yesterday]
    Nicmos , 66, M, Canada - see his 727 comments
    This is, well no other way to say it. A really bad movie. Move along.
    M 3V 9A 9
    [yesterday]
    DanDManlyMan , 48, M, Australia - see his 30 comments
    Some movies have great plots, brilliant actors and a level production quality so high that when the movie finishes you wonder where the time went.
    Others need the odd smattering of nudity to keep you interested.
    This movie falls into category B, but fails to deliver the hoped for nudity.
    M 1V 9A 9
    [yesterday]
    DanDManlyMan , 48, M, Australia - see his 30 comments
    This show is about as funny as yelling who farted at a funeral and then realizing that the smell is coming from the coffin.
    M 1V 9A 9
    [yesterday]
    DanDManlyMan , 48, M, Australia - see his 30 comments
    I feel like someone has just held my head under water and forced me to use a donkeys cock as a snorkel.
    M 3V 3A 3
    [yesterday]
    Aniketnegi1996 , 23, M, India - see his 13 comments
    Jijo
    M 1V 6A 6
    [yesterday]
    kevvie , 37, M, South Africa - see his 37 comments
    Very disappointed. Acting is really bad, it's a cheap remake of the DBS 1 in 1999. Same story, with a few new elements, didn't even watch it to the end. Did I say the acting is really bad?
    [yesterday]
    froyed , 40, M, Saudi Arabia - see his 39 comments
    is it worth it ?
    anyone recommend this serious
    M 6V 10A 7
    [yesterday]
    fusspot , 73, M, United Kingdom - see his 982 comments
    I found the audio a bit too low on this copy. The plot is harsh and uncompromising, much like the weather and countryside in the film. Very good story; very well acted. Worth seeing as it is inspired by true events.
    Page 1234567891011 > >>

    Sponsored links